On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 00:50, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
>> implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's
>> more verbose -v output.
>
> And here is a stab at that:
Grr... stupid word wrapping. Attached.