On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think what the hash index patch really needs is some performance
> testing. I'm willing to take responsibility for the code being okay
> or not, but I haven't got any production-grade hardware to do realistic
> performance tests on. I'd like to see a few more scenarios tested than
> the one provided so far: in particular, wide vs narrow index keys and
> good vs bad key distributions.
> If anyone is willing to do comparative performance testing, I'll
> volunteer to make up two variant patches that do it both ways and
> are otherwise equivalent.
I can happily through some hardware at this. Although
"production-grade" is in the eye of the beholder...
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
