Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Date
Msg-id 34b759cf-e2eb-2244-0d3b-9538b387b249@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-08-13 00:34, Andres Freund wrote:
> I e.g. just re-indented patch 0001 of my GetSnapshotData() series and
> most of the hunks were entirely unrelated. Despite the development
> window for 14 having only relatively recently opened. Based on my
> experience it tends to get worse over time.

Do we have a sense of why poorly-indented code gets committed?  I think 
some of the indentation rules are hard to follow manually.  (pgperltidy 
is worse.)

Also, since pgindent gets run eventually anyway, it's not really that 
important to get the indentation right the first time.  I suspect the 
goal of most authors and committers is to write readable code rather 
than to divine the exact pgindent output.

I think as a start, we could just issue a guidelines that all committed 
code should follow pgindent.  That has never really been a guideline, so 
it's not surprising that it's not followed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)