Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim B. Mikheev
Subject Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
Date
Msg-id 34FE6B78.5DE8B8AC@sable.krasnoyarsk.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field  (Peter T Mount <psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk>)
Responses Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
List pgsql-hackers
Peter T Mount wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > make text a blob datatype (maybe storing <= 8k row with tuple, >=8k in blob
> > > tablespace)
> >
>
> There was some talk about this about a month ago.
>
> Although we now have blob support in the JDBC driver, there is one
> outstanding issue with them, that I was waiting for 6.3 to be released
> before starting on it (and almost certainly starting a discussion here
> about it).
>
> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block size
> would hit the same problem.

When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
else. Is this Ok for you ?

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.3 question...
Next
From: "Pedro J. Lobo"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX