Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?
Date
Msg-id 34FABAD1.5BC5D73D@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Sounds like the plan internally grew (possible w/subselect stuff?!?) and
> > has gone over that 8k limit.
>
>     I think it must be due to the cleanups in the node-print and
>     read funcs. They now output/read ALL fields in the nodes.

Oh, I didn't realize that the print functions were actually used for something
other than printing and debugging. I had started to add a few new nodes when I
was trying to debug the "primary key" code.

Should we go through and bracket some of those with #ifdef QUERYDEBUG or
something like that? Where are they actually used? Should we try to keep these
at a minimum for production compiles of the system??

                                           - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maarten Boekhold
Date:
Subject: Perl module installs in wrong place
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT_USER