> I believe, one thing further, that since we started off under the
> Berkeley license, we can't change anyway (not that I would consider it
> *looks around*)...
Well, the way I read it one could take and use the source code for any purpose
(including developing another product or set of source code with other
conditions) as long as the Berkeley conditions are met. Those conditions seem
to cover giving UCB some credit for having done the work, and protecting UCB
from liability resulting from use of software which they had once developed.
btw, the license terms in the Postgres95 docs are slightly different, but with
the same intent. As you point out, that license seems to suit us just fine :)
- Tom
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 1990, 1993
> * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
> *
> * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> * are met:
> * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
> * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> software
> * must display the following acknowledgement:
> * This product includes software developed by the University of
> * California, Berkeley and its contributors.
