Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs
Date
Msg-id 34F22D60.E1F685E0@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs  (ocie@paracel.com)
List pgsql-hackers
> This is exactly how Postgres works now and differ from 3 "big boys".
> If there are no objections then I'll leave this as is. We can return
> to this issue latter.

I interprete SQL92 the same way. Let's leave as-is indefinitely/forever...

                                      - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs
Next
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Views on aggregates - need assistence