Re: [HACKERS] Massimo patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Massimo patch
Date
Msg-id 34E670EF.AB0FD92A@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Massimo patch  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Here is a description of the major patch from Massimo.  The irony of
> this is that the mail message is dated January 27th, when application of
> the patch would have been easier because we were not in beta testing.  I
> have a copy of the patch here on my machine.
>
> What do people want to do with this?  I have reviewed the patch, and it
> looks good, but it may take work to merge in because it is against
> 6.2.1p7, not 6.3 beta, and it does introduce quite a bit of new code.

Jeesh. Sure looks nice. Without knowing how fundamental the code changes are, it
is hard to say for sure, but I would think we would want to put this in, unless
it leads to major breakage. Someone would need to take the patches, merge them
all in as a group, and validate the regression tests to see where we are on them.
I'd even think it would be worth doing if it delays release a couple of weeks,
which it may not.

More comments??

                                                      - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Massimo patch
Next
From: Brook Milligan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] Valid ports for v6.3 -- NetBSD/i386 compile errors