Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database?
Date
Msg-id 34D8A91D.B7D5F56B@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database?  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] is Postgres an SQL-based database?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> >      In this release there's a very useful function LENGTH(), thanks to Thomas.
> >      but it's not SQL. CHARACTER_LENGTH() or CHAR_LENGTH() this is SQL.
> Perhaps we can translate function names in the parser as we do for type
> names? I'll look into it...

I have gram.y patches to do this. No visible effect on the regression execution speed,
which thanks to Bruce is on my machine down to a record 2:23 elapsed execution time;
the last speeds were in the 2:31 range.

I'm planning on bumping the gram.y cvs version to 2.0 for this change, due to the
_large_ number of accumulated improvements. Any objections?

                                                      - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hi
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hi