Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Christensen
Subject Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output
Date
Msg-id 34C3B8DC-1A40-4CD4-8379-98D320F9A948@crunchydata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output  (<Shinya11.Kato@nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> I had not really looked at the patch, but if there's a cleanup portion to the same
>> patch as you're adding the YB too, then maybe it's worth separating those out
>> into another patch so that the two can be considered independently.
>
> I agree with this opinion. It seems to me that we should think about units and refactoring separately.
> Sorry for the confusion.

Sure thing, I think that makes sense. Refactor with existing units and debate the number of additions units to include.
Ido think Petabytes and Exabytes are at least within the realm of ones we should include; less tied to ZB and YB; just
includedfor completeness.  


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving isolationtester's data output
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicate history file?