Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Date
Msg-id 3492533.1664217286@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 01:33:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> +        Previously such files were left in the current directory,
> +        requiring manual cleanup.  It's still necessary to remove them
> +        manually afterwards, but now one can just remove that whole
> +        subdirectory.

> If pg_upgrade succeeds, then it removes the dir itself (so it's not
> "necessary").

Ah, I'd only ever paid attention to failure cases, so I didn't
realize that :-(.  Text adjusted:

        Previously such files were left in the current directory,
        requiring manual cleanup.  Now they are automatically removed on
        successful completion of <application>pg_upgrade</application>.

I took most of your other suggestions, too.  Thanks!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP OWNED BY is broken on master branch.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13