Re: 8.3: timestamp subtraction - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Havasvölgyi Ottó
Subject Re: 8.3: timestamp subtraction
Date
Msg-id 34608c0c0905240200g43b03c18rb3ebd85ef157a7f9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.3: timestamp subtraction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Thanks Tom for your comments.

I meant the build in this directory: http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.6/win32/, and the builds for win32 of other versions in the binary directory.
What is the trend of these builds regarding floating point timestamps? For example what about 8.4?

Thanks,
Otto


2009/5/24 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Havasvölgyi Ottó <havasvolgyi.otto@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks, It's off in both 8.2 and 8.3.

As was already stated, that depends on which build you're using.
(And no, "the Win32 distribution on the PgSql site" is not a unique
description, not even for a single PG version.)

> What will be the default in 8.4?

The same comment will apply to 8.4.  There is a general trend away from
floating point timestamps, but there will probably be some builds
continuing to use them for a long time to come, because of compatibility
considerations.

                       regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: do postgresql this job for me ? (firebird user)
Next
From: mnavahan
Date:
Subject: Re: do postgresql this job for me ? (firebird user)