Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer" - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
Date
Msg-id 3452214.1673108049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-docs
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
> 8.5.2
> ...
> "The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
> hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
> hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"

"Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"