Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/25/09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This patch has broken the no-backup property of the scanner, which
>> is an absolutely unacceptable penalty for such a second-order feature.
>> Please fix or revert.
> How do I find out the state of said property?
Per the comment at the head of scan.l, add the -b switch to the flex
call and see what flex says about it.
> Currently I assume its related to xeunicodebad pattern?
Probably, but I didn't check.
regards, tom lane
