Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Dear Antonin,
>
> > Having the extension in contrib would be useful in cases a 3rd party extension
> > uses injection points in its regression tests. In particular, it's more
> > practical for CI to install the "injection_points" extension by installing the
> > "contrib" binary package than by building the whole server from source. (AFAIK
> > the src/modules/injection_points directory is currently not included in any
> > package.)
>
> IIRC, one of the motivation why we put src/test/modules is to ensure the flexiblity.
> Even contrib modules must follow the rule [1]. E.g., ABI must be kept and API
> change should be considered carefully - commits like [2] may be restricted.
> Also We may even have to consider that whether the name of injection points
> should be kept or not.
>
> How do you feel?
>
> [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/xfunc-c.html#XFUNC-GUIDANCE-API-COMPATIBILITY
> [2]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/f4af4515bb5f3591d49bc16b6cb8ddbf66f98374
ok, I assume you mean that the requirement for ABI/API stability would make it
hard to include tests for fixes like [2] in minor releases. Thanks for
explanation.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
