Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings
Date
Msg-id 3426460.1708095481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: table inheritance versus column compression and storage settings
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> I have committed this.  It is great to get this behavior fixed and also 
> to get the internals more consistent.  Thanks.

I find it surprising that the committed patch does not touch
pg_dump.  Is it really true that pg_dump dumps situations with
differing compression/storage settings accurately already?

(Note that it proves little that the pg_upgrade test passes,
since if pg_dump were blind to the settings applicable to a
child table, the second dump would still be blind to them.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL