Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com> writes:
> I'm not sure what you mean. Earlier you rejected my bug-report on the
> iterator because you it was the callers responsability to deal with it
> (hence this patch). Are you now suggesting that we fix that bug instead?
Quite honestly, I dunno. I agree that there's something lacking in this
stack of behaviors, but I don't think any of the solutions suggested so
far actually fix it ...
regards, tom lane
