Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough
Date
Msg-id 3400.1154972686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough  (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>)
Responses Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough
Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough
List pgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> writes:
> A simple way of doing this might be to use a minimum cost number?

But you don't have any cost numbers until after you've done the plan.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Another Ltree/GiST problem