Hi,
On 2025-04-02 14:17:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Does anybody have an opinion about how non-invasive to be in the
> > back-branches? The minimal version is something like this diff:
>
> Minimal is good -- less chance of breaking anything.
>
> > - Should we commit the test showing that the naive implementation of
> > index-only-bitmap-heapscan is broken, in case somebody wants to re-introduce
> > it?
>
> Seems like a good idea. Agreed on HEAD-only for that.
Pushed that way.
Thanks for the report and the fix!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
