Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f05011106235da6723e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-performance
Connect to an external data system using a socket and propagate data
changes using a trigger... I've had to do this, and it sucks to be
stuck in Oracle!

Alex Turner
NetEconomist


On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:52 -0600, Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:46:01PM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > You sir are correct!  You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;).
>
> On the other hand, PL/SQL is incredibly powerful, especially combined
> with all the tools/utilities that come with Oracle. I think you'd be
> hard-pressed to find too many real-world examples where you could do
> something with a PostgreSQL procedural language that you couldn't do
> with PL/SQL.
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
> Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
>
> Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
> Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
> FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rosser Schwarz
Date:
Subject: Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?