Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Date
Msg-id 33be66e0-ee1d-70a8-9337-8587f3ba5cac@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/7/17 11:44 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> This is not overloading of SQL command - it is like annotations. It is
> smart idea, so I was not surprised if ANSI/SQL reuses it.

SHas ANSI declared that they will NEVER support := in a SELECT that's 
not running in a stored function? Because if they haven't done that, 
there's nothing preventing them from doing just that. If that happens 
we're going to have some very difficult choices to make.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL