Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function
Date
Msg-id 3385177.1674839662@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function  (Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com> writes:
>> Both of you are arguing as though GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL is a security
>> property.  It is not, or at least it's so trivially bypassable
>> that it's useless to consider it one.  All it is is a de-clutter
>> mechanism.

> Understood. If that is the case, then I am ok with the patch.

Pushed v4, then.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: João Paulo Labegalini de Carvalho
Date:
Subject: Optimizing PostgreSQL with LLVM's PGO+LTO
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump