Re: Clang optimiser vs preproc.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Clang optimiser vs preproc.c
Date
Msg-id 3369162.1702694688@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Clang optimiser vs preproc.c  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Clang optimiser vs preproc.c
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> FYI, it looks like there is a big jump in CPU time to compile preproc.c at -O2:

> clang15: ~16s
> clang16: ~211s
> clang17: ~233s

What are the numbers for gram.c?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Clang optimiser vs preproc.c
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Clang optimiser vs preproc.c