Re: refactor ownercheck and aclcheck functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Antonin Houska
Subject Re: refactor ownercheck and aclcheck functions
Date
Msg-id 3365.1667827182@antos
Whole thread Raw
In response to refactor ownercheck and aclcheck functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> These patches take the dozens of mostly-duplicate pg_foo_ownercheck() and
> pg_foo_aclcheck() functions and replace (most of) them by common functions
> that are driven by the ObjectProperty table.  All the required information is
> already in that table.
>
> This is similar to the consolidation of the drop-by-OID functions that we did
> a while ago (b1d32d3e3230f00b5baba08f75b4f665c7d6dac6).

I've reviewed this patch, as it's related to my patch [1] (In particular, it
reduces the size of my patch a little bit). I like the idea to reduce the
amount of (almost) copy & pasted code. I haven't found any problem in your
patch that would be worth mentioning, except that the 0001 part does not apply
to the current master branch.

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres auto vacuum - Disable