Re: [HACKERS] fsync vs open_sync - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Subject Re: [HACKERS] fsync vs open_sync
Date
Msg-id 33646.64.119.142.34.1092161092.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] fsync vs open_sync  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> Guys, just so you know:
>
> OSDL did some testing and found Ext3 to be perhaps the worst FS for
> PostgreSQL
> -- although this testing was with the default options.   Ext3 involved an
> almost 40% write performance penalty compared with Ext2, whereas the
> penalty
> for ReiserFS and JFS was less than 10%.
>
> This concurs with my personal experience.

I had exactly the same experience

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Raoul Buzziol
Date:
Subject: Re: Help specifying new machine
Next
From: pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Date:
Subject: Re: fsync vs open_sync