Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 33570.1677442113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> They're all animals for testing older LLVM versions. They're using
> pretty old clang versions. phycodurus and dragonet are clang 3.9, petalura and
> desmoxytes is clang 4, idiacanthus and pogona are clang 5.

[ shrug ... ]  If I thought this was actually good code, I might
agree with ignoring these warnings; but I think what it mostly is
is misleading overcomplication.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command