Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more
>> like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015. I'm still not taking
>> point on that, though.)
> For the sigprocmask() part, here's a patch that passes CI. Only the
> SIG_SETMASK case is actually exercised by our current code, though.
Passes an eyeball check, but I can't actually test it.
regards, tom lane
