Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 332D8050-2479-4D0F-95A9-765B89268E83@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Umm, nobody has attributed ridiculousness to anyone. Please don't put words in my mouth. But I think this is a
perfectlyreasonable discussion to have. Nobody gets to come along and get the features they want without some sort of
consensus,not me, not you, not Joachim, not Tom. 

I'm not disputing that we COULD reject the patch. I AM disputing that we've made a cogent argument for doing so.

...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Hi- How frequently Postgres Poll for trigger file
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump