Re: Schema per user? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Anders Steinlein
Subject Re: Schema per user?
Date
Msg-id 3317AA3B-BE4E-4875-AC38-918BFBEA33FD@steinlein.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema per user?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Schema per user?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On May 7, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Anders Steinlein
> <anders@steinlein.no> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm pondering a design question for a subscription-based web-app we
>> are
>> developing. Would it be feasible to create a new schema per user
>> account,
>> setting the search_path to their own schema during login?
>>
>> [snip]
>
> We're looking at something similar here at work, but in the 10k to 10M
> range of schemas.  I'll let you know how our testing goes.
>
> 1,000 is nothing in terms of schemas.  You should be fine.

I'd be *very* interested to hear your experiences once you get some
results.

Generally though, what made you consider such a solution? Same
advantages as I mentioned? One thing I'm a bit usure of how best to
solve is where to place the "users" or some such table for
authentication and other "shared" info -- simply in the "public"
schema, perhaps?

\a.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema per user?
Next
From: Adam Ruth
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema per user?