Re: Direct I/O - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Direct I/O
Date
Msg-id 3316662.1680930205@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Direct I/O  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> I did some testing with non-default block sizes, and found a few minor
> things that needed adjustment.

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2023-04-08%2004%3A42%3A04

This seems like another thing that should not have been pushed mere
hours before feature freeze.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct I/O
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: check_GUC_init(wal_writer_flush_after) fails with non-default block size