On 10/18/2017 08:49 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 10:16 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
>> On 10/18/2017 7:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
>>>> A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to
>>>> 10.0?
>>>
>>> There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production.
>>
>> Then think of it as 9.7.0 but with an easier name to pronounce ;)
>
> No .0 is going into production...
>
I am not sure why this is even a question. There are plenty of
businesses that can risk the deployment of a .0 release but there are
also *MANY THAT CAN NOT*. The proper way to do this is to have a staging
server running the .0 release that gets beaten on by the application for
a few months and reports anything back to the community they find.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
