-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
'k, the message you sent had:
> was executed with status:
> 0 (failure)
which indicates it failed ... do you have a corresponding URL @ archives that
shows that it did go through that I can check against?
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 18:44:52 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> was executed with status:
> 0 (failure)
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> - --On Friday, October 27, 2006 15:54:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Anyway I wonder why it does report "failure", when the messages do make
>> > it through the list to all subscribers and the archives. Shouldn't it
>> > report "success" it that case?
>>
>> You shouldn't see anything on successful posts ... at least, I haven't been
>> ...
>
> Well, that's what I'm reporting -- for the successful posts I do get a
> message.
>
>> > (The messages rejected by moderators don't get reported at all.)
>>
>> No reason for it, since you are the one that rejected it, would be kinda
>> redundant to email you to remind yourself that you've rejected it, no? :)
>
> Certainly. (Really I don't need any reminder of anything, much less a
> reminder that a message was just successfully posted to the list).
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFQoB74QvfyHIvDvMRAjn6AKCNhh29gVXzMIOQ7WpO/3nwUSYwqACgv+LU
5dn772fXxiAhFnCzWz0DEEk=
=VuKr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
