Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Date
Msg-id 3299.1237686558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> We've been talking about this magical "proper module facility" for a few 
> releases now... are we still opposed to putting contrib modules in thier own 
> schema?

I'm hesitant to do that when we don't yet have either a design or a
migration plan for the module facility.  We might find we'd shot
ourselves in the foot, or at least complicated the migration situation
unduly.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 8.4 item list