Re: Alter index rename concurrently to - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
Date
Msg-id 3284df7c-32dd-1a13-54ad-f5c76d21d49f@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Alter index rename concurrently to  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/08/2018 15:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> ISTM, if you want to increase consistency in this area, you've to go
>> further. E.g. processing invalidations in StartTransactionCommand() in
>> all states, which'd give you a lot more consistency.
> 
> Hmm, that seems like a pretty good idea.

That would only affect top-level commands, not things like SPI.  Is that
what we want?  Or we could sprinkle additional
AcceptInvalidationMessages() calls in spi.c.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Alter index rename concurrently to