Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile
Date
Msg-id 32654.1550594896@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> The real reason why variables commonly need to be volatile when used in
> signal handlers is not the signal handler side, but the normal code flow
> side.

Yeah, exactly.  You have not explained why it'd be safe to ignore that.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PGAdmin 4 don't refresh server info after restarting
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on NFS