On May 30, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
> of the sanity check. I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.
Should you be validating them on a per-time zone basis? Or does it matter?
David
