Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id 32347.1522865050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Thanks, pushed.

This has broken the selinux regression tests, evidently because it
removed ONLY from the emitted FK test queries.  While we could change
the expected results, I would first like to hear a defense of why that
change is a good idea.  It seems highly likely to be the wrong thing
for non-partitioned cases.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: some last patches breaks plan cache
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Add support for printing/reading MergeAction nodes