Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:08 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Personally I'd keep SO_TYPE_TIDSCAN physically adjacent to the other
>> SO_TYPE_xxxSCAN entries in the list, but of course that's just cosmetic.
> +1. So I will apply the latest patch (adding SO_TYPE_TIDSCAN just after
> SO_TYPE_ANALYZE) only to v12.
Works for me.
regards, tom lane
