Re: stress test for parallel workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date
Msg-id 32038.1570976985@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stress test for parallel workers  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: stress test for parallel workers
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Probably requires reproducing on a pretty recent kernel first, to have a
> decent chance of being investigated...

How recent do you think it needs to be?  The machine I was testing on
yesterday is under a year old:

uname -m = ppc64le
uname -r = 4.18.19-100.fc27.ppc64le
uname -s = Linux
uname -v = #1 SMP Wed Nov 14 21:53:32 UTC 2018

The latest-by-version-number ppc64 kernel I can find in the buildfarm
is bonito,

uname -m = ppc64le
uname -r = 4.19.15-300.fc29.ppc64le
uname -s = Linux
uname -v = #1 SMP Mon Jan 14 16:21:04 UTC 2019

and that's certainly shown it too.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: tuplesort test coverage