On 1/7/24 11:22, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> On 7/1/2024 06:54, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> It's an interesting are for experiments, no doubt about it. And if you
>> choose to explore it, that's fine. But it's better to be aware it may
>> not end with a commit.
>> For the multi-dimensional case, I propose we first try to experiment
>> with the various algorithms, and figure out what works etc. Maybe
>> implementing them in python or something would be easier than C.
>
> Curiously, trying to utilize extended statistics for some problematic
> cases, I am experimenting with auto-generating such statistics by
> definition of indexes [1]. Doing that, I wanted to add some hand-made
> statistics like a multidimensional histogram or just a histogram which
> could help to perform estimation over a set of columns/expressions.
> I realized that current hooks get_relation_stats_hook and
> get_index_stats_hook are insufficient if I want to perform an estimation
> over a set of ANDed quals on different columns.
> In your opinion, is it possible to add a hook into the extended
> statistics to allow for an extension to propose alternative estimation?
>
> [1] https://github.com/danolivo/pg_index_stats
>
No idea, I haven't thought about that very much. Presumably the existing
hooks are insufficient because they're per-attnum? I guess it would make
sense to have a hook for all the attnums of the relation, but I'm not
sure it'd be enough to introduce a new extended statistics kind ...
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
