Re: Dealing with SeqScans when Time-based Partitions Cut Over - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Dealing with SeqScans when Time-based Partitions Cut Over
Date
Msg-id 31beb34c3108173ea386d567de92da720da4bb07.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Dealing with SeqScans when Time-based Partitions Cut Over  (Matthew Planchard <msplanchard@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 13:48 -0500, Matthew Planchard wrote:
> In a table with high insert frequency (~1.5k rows/s) and high query
> frequency (~1k queries/s), partitioned by record creation time, we have
> observed the following behavior:
>
> * When the current time crosses a partition boundary, all new records
>   are written to the new partition, which was previously empty, as
>   expected
>
> * Because the planner's latest knowledge of the partition was based on
>   its state prior to the cutover, it assumes the partition is empty and
>   creates plans that use sequential scans
>
> * The table accumulates tens to hundreds of thousands of rows, and the
>   sequentail scans start to use nearly 100% of available database CPU
>
> * Eventually the planner updates thee stats and all is well, but the
>   cycle repeats the next time the partitions cut over.
>
> We have tried setting up a cron job that runs ANALYZE on the most recent
> partition of the table every 15 seconds at the start of the hour, and
> while this does help in reducing the magnitude and duration of the
> problem, it is insufficient to fully resolve it (our engineers are still
> getting daily pages for high DB CPU utilization).
>
> We have considered maintaining a separate connection pool with
> connections that have `enable_seqscan` set to `off`, and updating the
> application to use that pool for these queries, but I was hoping the
> community might have some better suggestions.

I would try to tune autovacuum to check more often:

  autovacuum_naptime = 5s  # perhaps even less

Then hopefully the new partitions get analyzed early enough.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: PQexecPrepared() question
Next
From: Andrew
Date:
Subject: Re: wal segment size