Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> That's what's bothering me, too. On the other hand, if we can't think of
>> a scenario where it'd be necessary to replay the high-offset update, then
>> I'm disinclined to mess with the code further.
> And the whole point of the undefined page error checking is to detect
> cases like this, so covering them up in the name of possible edge
> cases we haven't thought of kind of defeats the purpose.
Yeah, good point. Let's leave it alone and see if the existing fix
helps.
regards, tom lane
