Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Date
Msg-id 31955.1428346338@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values  ("Adrian.Vondendriesch" <Adrian.Vondendriesch@credativ.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> I'll let a hacker determine whether this is a bug or a feature request
> though it is a POLA violation in either case.

I'd say it's a feature request --- a perfectly reasonable one, but I doubt
we'd alter the behavior of the function in the back branches.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: src/port/getopt_long.c lossy with arguments having no option characters