Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Date
Msg-id 3194CE23-534D-4848-8271-7F09BF6D0EBF@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
List pgsql-hackers
> On 8 Apr 2023, at 00:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>>> On 7 Apr 2023, at 23:01, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> Staring at this I've been unable to figure out if there an underlying problem
>> here or a flaky testrun, since I can't reproduce it.  Maybe the animal owner
>> (on cc) have any insights?
>
>> The test has passed on several different platforms in the buildfarm, including
>> Linux, Solaris, macOS, NetBSD, FreeBSD and other OpenBSD animals.  It also
>> passed in an OpenBSD VM running with our Cirrus framework.
>
> prion and mantid have now failed with the same symptom.  I don't
> see a pattern, but it's not OpenBSD-only.  It will be interesting
> to see if the failure is intermittent or not on those animals.

It would be interesting to know how far in the pumped input they get, if they
time out on the first one with nothing going through?  Will investigate further
tomorrow to see.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Show various offset arrays for heap WAL records