Re: LLVM 22 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LLVM 22
Date
Msg-id 3191452.1775104002@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LLVM 22  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 4:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity: I see you back-patched that all the way,
>> but midge had only been failing on v18 and HEAD.  Were you just
>> being defensive, or is there something deeper there?

> It was failing locally for me on all branches.

Ah, thanks for that detail.

> I don't know why midge wasn't failing on 14-17.  Could jit be disabled
> somewhere secret?  Aarch64 vs amd64, but this issue doesn't seem to be
> architecture related, it's IR-level.

Definitely not arch-specific, because I reproduced it on x86_64.
midge's lack of failure is odd then, but I'm not sure it's worth
expending a lot of brain cells on.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Small and unlikely overflow hazard in bms_next_member()
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGUSR1 for slotsync worker to exit during promotion?