Martín Marqués <martin@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Looking at this issue today, I found that we are not setting a
> dependency for an index created inside an extension.
Surely the index has a dependency on a table, which depends on the
extension?
If you mean that you want an extension to create an index on a table that
doesn't belong to it, but it's assuming pre-exists, I think that's just
stupid and we need not support it.
regards, tom lane
