Re: Corruption during WAL replay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date
Msg-id 3185871.1648181300@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> The only thing I can really conclude here is that we apparently end up with
> the same checksum for exactly the modifications we are doing? Just on those
> two damn instances? Reliably?

IIRC, the table's OID or relfilenode enters into the checksum.
Could it be that assigning a specific OID to the table allows
this to happen, and these two animals are somehow assigning
that OID while others are using some slightly different OID?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests