Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date
Msg-id 31825.1443918954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 10/02/2015 09:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of
>>> pg_control.  It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms
>>> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many
>>> overwrite cases.

>> BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases
>> to push this in.  I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like
>> it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date.
>> 
>> If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ...

> Wait, we're backpatching this?

Of course.  It's not going to do much for buildfarm stability if it's
only in HEAD.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: creating extension including dependencies
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Draft release notes are up for review