On 15.07.24 16:52, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 07/15/24 10:46, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> Ah, I may have mistaken which functions the patch meant to apply to.
>> ...
>> Any choice to use similar argument names in the regexp_* functions would
>> be a matter of consistency with the analogous ISO functions, not anything
>> mandated.
>
> Or, looking back, I might have realized these were the non-ISO regexp_*
> functions, but seen there was bikeshedding happening over the best name
> to use for the occurrence argument, and merely suggested ISO's choice
> OCCURRENCE for the analogous ISO functions, as a possible bikeshed
> accelerator.
These functions were copied from Oracle, so one argument was to use the
names from Oracle as-is.
