Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via
Date
Msg-id 3175.1146425348@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set
Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Documentation added, patch attached and applied.  Thanks.

I just got around to reading this patch.  Why is the syntax GRANT CONNECTION
and not GRANT CONNECT?  Privilege names are generally verbs not nouns.
Unless someone can point to a good reason for CONNECTION, I'm going to
change it.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: fori stmt with by keyword was:(Re: [HACKERS] for statement, adding a STEP clause?)
Next
From: Gevik Babakhani
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set